Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electric capacitivity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 16:37, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Electric capacitivity

Poorly written, badly spelled and titles article name, on information properly and adequately covered in capacitance article. No need for redirect, only link to this page now is another page created by same author tagged for merger. Gene Nygaard 14:23, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. PJM 14:38, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Delete, people come to encyclopedias looking for explanations, I've never heard the term "capacivity" before and I suspect it's a faulty translation. --Wtshymanski 02:53, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete I might suggest a redirect to capacitance if "capacitivity" were, in fact, a word, and people might look for it. But it's not, and they won't. Fan1967
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 03:03, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.