Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eigeleigen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Robert 18:28, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eigeleigen

Non notable and possibly nonexistent "fictional" word + badly written entry (no sources, no explanation of meaning of the word); PROD contested Ioannes Pragensis 12:29, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete fails WP:NEO Nearly Headless Nick 12:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Only Google hit is the page itself. Also, the only claim to fame on the page is that it is incorrectly believed to have been a word used in a film. I already get deletionist when there's more than one page on what is actually in a film. - Andre Engels 12:55, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, apparently a hoax. — Haeleth Talk 13:37, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above; WP:NEO and WP:HOAX--TBCTaLk?!? 14:04, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete because flergle. Danny Lilithborne 01:28, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete bloody hell, what else can be said? SM247^{My Talk} 01:42, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Uh, "blell"? Shenme 04:26, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.