Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Efront

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete as patent nonsense. --malathion ^talk 08:49, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Efront

Dicdef. DS 02:17, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete dicdef Soltak 02:47, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per Soltak --Apyule 03:11, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delēre_(?) as per Soltak. --Merovingian (t) (c) 06:15, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy.This "article" is a good example of some shortcomings in our speedy delete policy, in my humble opinion. There are two sentences on the page: "efront - virtual real estate frontage. Beach front, street front, efront." I do not know what the person who created this page is trying to say; it is most plausibly an ad, although google does not seem to show any company with the name selling real estate in the first hundred or so items. He may also have been attempting to define words. Or it may be spam. Regardless, it is not clearly comprehensible, and it most certainly should not be on Wikipedia. It is not unreasonable to allow sysops to delete this on sight, IMHO; we waste quite a bit of time voting on stuff like this. Is there a CSD that applies? I'm not certain, although I think a strong case can be made for G1 (see item 2 in WP:PN). I will apply the speedy tag(-patent nonsense), in the knowledge that a closer can always disagree and remove it, if in their opinion this should go through a vote. Respectfully—Encephalon | ζ | Σ 08:26:02, 2005-08-11 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.