Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Nixon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No Consensus/default keep. Xoloz 17:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edward Nixon

Non notable, company gives 13 Google hits, being sonbrother of notable person (Richard Nixon is not a reason to be included here: see also AfDs for Arthur Nixon and Harold Nixon Fram 12:52, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable. A mention on Richard Nixon's article would be more than sufficient. Ifnord 13:23, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. This stub still needs plenty of information on the finance scandal involving Nixon and Charles G. Rebozo. Jokestress 16:28, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete as subject falls short of WP:BIO, weak because of the Watergate mention, but this could be covered better at Richard Nixon or Watergate. I just don't see compelling evidence he meets WP:BIO.--Isotope23 16:43, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable. Anything useful can be merged to Richard Nixon or Watergate. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 22:33, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect or Keep if redir, then to something like "Richard Nixon's family" because there is plenty of useful information here to overload the Richard Nixon page with info. It may be helpful to remember that Fram nominated all of the following: Edward Nixon, Arthur Nixon, and Harold Nixon. While we are at it, why don't we delete, redirect, or leave alone Donald Nixon (another brother), Francis A. Nixon (his father), and Hannah Milhous Nixon (his mother). All of them have articles similar to or even less significant than this one. -- Matthew 15:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or redirect to Richard Nixon family, or something to that effect. RFerreira 03:19, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• 'Keep because of role in Watergate. PedanticallySpeaking 21:24, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.