Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Chester Congdon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:16, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edward Chester Congdon

Edward Chester Congdon (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

While there are other members of the Congdon family who may meet the Wikipedia biographical guidelines I find nothing to suggest that Edward Chester Congdon meets these guidelines and nothing in the article suggests this is the case. Delete.--Isotope23 20:44, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete, notability not asserted. Demiurge 21:02, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - no assertion or evidence of notability. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 22:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia not to be used as a memorial site/family history site. Camillus (talk) 11:38, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment See also Walter Bannister Congdon. Camillus (talk) 11:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per obvious lack of notability. Canadian-Bacon ^{t c} 17:18, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a geneological database either. He's not a noble. Can probably be speedied for want of assertion of notability. Ohconfucius 04:00, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.