Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Laskos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete'. `'mikka (t) 00:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ed Laskos

This is perhaps a borderline case of notability and expansion of the article might suffice to demonstrate that notability. I have added the nn-warn template to User talk:JasVe3, the only editor on the article, to encourage such action; as stated on the user's page, perhaps in a few years Mr. Lasko's accomplishments will be sufficiently notable not to be questioned in the manner I am now. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:37, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. A local (or relatively local) newscaster is not notable in and of himself. He would have needed to do something other than get hired as a broadcaster. Falcon 01:47, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete doesn't seem to pass WP:BIO Kevin 04:43, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and encourqage expansion. Notable journalist in US's second largest market. Calwatch 06:03, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete speculation the article will be better with expansion or that subject will become notable is well... Tychocat 11:59, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete doesn't assert notability and news reporters aren't automatically notable. --Tango 15:20, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable, fails WP:BIO —Mets501^talk 18:31, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. I can't really tell if this is notable if it is not expanded. --RabidMonkeysEatGrass 00:24, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• deletenot notable. not sourced Joan-of-arc 21:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Big market. Article could use some serious expansion and have a stub applied. StuffOfInterest 15:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• delete nn. `'mikka (t) 00:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.