Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economy of Scotland
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP Babajobu 01:16, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Economy of Scotland
Delete. This article is nothing more than copy-paste from Scotland article. Luka Jačov 12:54, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. This looks like a valid split from the main Scotland article. Looks like this will develop into a complete article of it's own (and probably the economy section in the main Scotland article will need to be shortened). Unless I'm wrong in how article slits are done... --Petros471 16:40, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - Better than no "Economy of Scotland". --Kilo-Lima 17:25, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. The Scotland article was getting far too big and desperately needs splitting. Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs 19:11, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, this happens all the time. Gazpacho 19:26, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per others above. Yeltensic42.618 23:35, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep: there is potential to mature over a period of time. --Bhadani 06:07, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as per above. --Terence Ong Talk 08:27, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, splitting is needed when another article gets to be too long. — TheKMantalk 23:42, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep This article was created as part of the on-going effort to get the main Scotland article up to Featured status. It was a Requested article at the Scottish Wikipedians' notice board. This is an extensive and complex topic, and as a very new article it is not bad: there is tons of scope for this to become a truly excellent article. Economic history of Scotland will likely be a necessary spin-off in the foreseeable future, if anyone is feeling keen :)--Mais oui! 20:28, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep- I can't believe this article was nominated for deletion! Astrotrain 22:02, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.