Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earth 2.0
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the nomination was Speedy delete nonsense by User:Pgk. Just zis Guy you know? 14:48, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Earth 2.0
In the words of the creating editor, "This is a proposed idea by me, not a real planet made of cardbaord". Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, so this editor's plans for a cardboard planet for "50 billion angry asians" is not a legitimate article. I've proposed the article for deletion; my prod was removed. BigNate37T·C 09:06, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete dumb. Danny Lilithborne 09:12, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete "covered in otter fat" and "the size of earth." Nominator should have speedied it, not prodded. --Richhoncho 09:25, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as nonsense. Nuttah68 10:24, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete I had a page of similar nonsense speedied. CSV G1 Martinp23 10:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Copyvio - the image of the Eath (Earth 1.0) is from Google Earth Martinp23 11:03, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as patent nonsense. RandyWang (raves/rants) 10:59, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as total nonsense. (aeropagitica) (talk) 12:11, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment From WP:CSD, "Patent nonsense, i.e. no meaningful content, unsalvageably incoherent page. This does not include: poor writing, ... implausible theories or hoaxes." I would prefer this content is up for as little time as possible, but is it really CSD G1? I'll definately agree that its deletion is non-controversial, which was why I originally decided to use prod. BigNate37T·C 12:18, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, so tagged, this is patent nonsense IMO. NawlinWiki 14:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
