Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earl Newton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. I'm just not seeing the notability here. IMDB is not enough in and of itself...--++Lar: t/c 03:26, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Earl Newton

• delete nn-fanfilm-maker— Milkandwookiees ^(T | C) 16:23, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep per this[1]. Yanksox 16:30, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep as per above. wikipediatrix 16:34, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:BIO; if he made NN skinflicks instead of NN skiffyporn, there'd be no debate. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:38, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep - Brand new user Milkandwookiees has suddenly nominated an awful lot of articles for deletion with very flimsy reasoning. Possible WP:POINT? TheRealFennShysa 16:50, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • How about considering the nomination on its merits, rather than the nominator? -- GWO
• Delete per Angus McLellan. - Motor (talk) 16:58, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Angus McLellan. He'd find a bigger audience for porn, too. -- GWO
• Delete OK, off the top, having an IMDb listing is not grounds for a speedy keep, just like not having an IMDb listing is not grounds for a speedy deletion. With that said, this guy is a completely non-notable filmmaker. The IMDb listing means NOTHING- first of all, we've deleted people and films listed on IMDb before (see, as only one example, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tim_Morton), and secondly, his IMDb listing mentions just one movie, and nobody's ever seen it (only 12 votes on said site). He's done nothing that's significant enough for inclusion on Wikipedia. -- Kicking222 17:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. If his films were notable, I would suggest making this a redirect. But they're not, so I don't. Kafziel 17:47, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per Angus McLellan and WP:BIO. As Kicking222 stated, IMDb listing is not valid criteria for inclusion in and of itself.--Isotope23 18:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Per original nomination. — WCityMike (talk • contribs) 20:01, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Per above arguments. Wickethewok 20:14, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Whether or not the nomination is in good faith, the comments by Yanksox and wikipediatrix are not. This is not the article you're looking for. There's nothing notable here. Move along. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 21:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nomination. Nertz 00:38, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Kicking222. --Metropolitan90 06:01, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.