Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EMuleP3P

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. - Bobet 15:09, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] EMuleP3P

Delete. The file sharing program "eMule P3P" does not exist, and will most likely never. All it is is a forum and one zealot fanboy -- the creator of this article. The screenshot is not a "beta" of eMule P3P as it purports to be, but a screenshot of eMule. The given "release date" is an arbitrary future date. --Haakon 10:51, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as hoax, and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --Terence Ong 11:22, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• it is a serious project, as 2 domains have been reserved: emulep3p.net and emulep3p.com, so just a matter of time. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.236.14.64 (talk • contribs).
• Delete, vanity article about future software. Crystal Ball and all that, per Mr. Ong. Kuru ^talk 20:31, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as crystal ball and likely hoax. The term "P3P" sounds like BJAODN material, though. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:43, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• BJAODN Come on folks... Computerjoe 21:09, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Nonsense. Crystal bollocks. -- Krash (Talk) 16:49, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Mild keep: no direct evidence showing that this is nonsense. A bit of AGF is allowable. Deryck C. 14:32, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • AGF has little to do with my nomination. I don't assume the article starter wrote the article in bad faith. I believe he does think eMule P3P is going to be a great file sharing application, but the problem is that the application does not exist and shows no sign of existance beyond a low-activity web forum (his posts are about all the activity there is). Even if the application will spark into existance at some future date (which I think is highly unlikely, given my basic understanding of how the supposed technologies involved work), Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. It's fine if he wants to get more exposure for this potential future application, but Wikipedia is not a suitable venue for it. Haakon 18:57, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Mild delete. Seems to be a real project (I see no evidence that it is a hoax), but software does not exist and the article is probably premature. Article's re-creation should be allowed if the software materializes. Vlad1 02:07, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.