Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-negotiation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 22:29, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] E-negotiation

Kind of the definition of regular negotiation if you ask me. Jemiller226 02:56, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

• E-Delete, superfluous. Sdedeo 02:59, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to negotiation. --Apyule 03:17, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete with no redirect. ESkog 04:36, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Dirigere_(?) to negotiation. --Merovingian (t) (c) 06:20, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, no redirect Cynical 09:51, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep or merge with negotiation.--Fenice 11:09, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect. What does "dirigere" mean, please? Is it a valid vote? Proto t c 11:33, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
  • See the little question mark link after it. It's Latin for redirect. Don't ask me why though. Never mind. the wub "?/!" 16:01, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
  • It appears to be the infinitive form of "redirect". I suspect the Merovingian has recently started taking Latin. It seems to me he should be using the imperitive, however. Oh, and delete (same in Latin, I think, for "destroy") or redirect. I don't care which. -R. fiend 16:06, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with negotiation. --rdnk 15:06, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, awwww... I wanted to say "E-Delete" :( the wub "?/!" 15:59, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Just delete no redirect no merge no latin words, let's not make up words. feydey 21:28, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.