Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-Symposium
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. SushiGeek 08:30, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] E-Symposium
Creating page for orphaned AfD by 81.138.210.67. I don't know what the original criteria were... Alexa rank > 1 million though. -- Mithent 22:15, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
The user I mentioned contributed this to this AfD's talk page: 1: This is not an informative article, it's an advertisement for a commercial service; 2: It is inaccurate and misleading - there are many similar services 81.138.210.67 19:48, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that a decision may usefully be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
Flowerparty■ 01:16, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Flowerparty■ 01:16, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per mediocre Alexa data. Royboycrashfan 01:19, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 01:30, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, nn website and low Alexa ranking. --Terence Ong 04:50, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep with cleanup. The google spamming using subdomains of e-symposium.com is annoying, and these things are probably the conference equivalents of diploma mills, but we can't ignore the idea of an online conference as a new form of communication. —Quarl (talk) 2006-04-09 08:37Z
- Comment: I have marked it as a copyright violation and listed it on copyright problems. -- Kjkolb 09:37, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Quarl. --Siva1979Talk to me 14:11, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per 81.138.210.67, in case it is not a copyright violation. -- Kjkolb 14:22, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete spam ⇒ SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 06:38, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
- Not sure if it's spam or not, notable or not, but it's a copyvio, and I recommend leaving it to WP:CP. Stifle (talk) 23:30, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.