Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dudnikoff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was userfied to User:Allen Dudnikoff/genealogy, give the guy a break... --Titoxd^(?!?) 06:39, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dudnikoff

Appears to be geneology, doesn't appear to be noteable, and has a faint whiff of vanity about it. Page was created by Allen Dudnikoff, who has no other contributions to his name. → Ξxtreme Unction {yak yak yak ł blah blah blah} 21:52, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

• Comment - The AfD notification has already been removed once by someone. → Ξxtreme Unction {yak yak yak ł blah blah blah} 21:58, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Less than 100 google results for Dudnikoff, about half of the English ones are about Allen, the creator of the article. Indium 22:08, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep I'm a bit torn. It doesn't look like much but it could just possibly be encyclopedic material. Can we give it a bit more time, ask the author to cite sources and see if anything turns up? - Haukur Þorgeirsson 22:13, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Hey Okay, here is the story... I've been going around and asking my realitives about my family history.. this is the information I've gotten along with some info about a Former Soviet Village called Dudnika, I put this artical together... there is a beter history somewhere I don't know where based on the fact that there are really just 10 Dudnikoffs in the world living I'll possibly never know it. I've tried research and asking my realitives in Moscow, they tell me the same stories... I geuss it possibly wrong.. but it could have fact there also.
  • Okay, glad you've found your way here. If you want the article to be kept you've got to cite some published books or other verifiable sources for the information. They don't have to be in English. - Haukur Þorgeirsson 23:31, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
  • The problem you run into there is that you've done original geneological research. And Wikipedia has a no original research policy. Just sayin'. → Ξxtreme Unction {yak yak yak ł blah blah blah} 22:41, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Unless any of this can be sourced it qualifies as OR. --JJay 22:27, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Userfy to User:Allen Dudnikoff howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 23:26, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as original research not verified by any references. Tupsharru 07:08, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.