Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duberry cookies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - no evidence has been provided that they are notable. Yomangani^talk 11:22, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Duberry cookies

A consensus was reached at DRV to overturn the speedy deletion of this article [1]. This is a procedural nomination so I abstain. Thryduulf 15:38, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

• Abstain Do we anticipate a separate article on every cookie/biscuit from every manufacturer? If this one is unique or otherwise notable, keep it. If it isn't, delete it. In the UK, I've never heard of it or the company. Emeraude 16:49, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep. Meets the requirements for product notability. Original speedy was nonsense.Cynical 22:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. While I agree that the original speedy was poorly done, it might have been right for this article. I did a brief look for internet sources on this brand and had a lot of trouble. I'll look more thoroughly later, but I think this one might get deleted after all. - Lex 19:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete until notability / references introduced. Turnstep 16:36, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
• keep please it is a notable cookie brand in england Yuckfoo 22:48, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Turnstep. Yuckfoo, if this is a notable brand, then please add reliable third-party citations to the article to establish its notability. Thanks, Vectro 00:37, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.