Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dropped cheese

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:59, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dropped cheese

Hoax superstition. No references provided. No relevant Ghits. Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 07:15, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Clearly cannot be verfied therefore it has to go unless sources can be provided Ydam 08:45, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless source for folklore can be provided. Otherwise, probable hoax and likely to attract mice. --Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 09:36, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete likely to be hoax. Kimchi.sg 10:08, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment If Wikipedia adopted a Limbo namespace, this article could be moved to Limbo during the discussion on deletion. Moving an article to Limbo would remove it from the article namespace and prevent search engines from delivering suspicious content while the community decides whether to keep or delete it. For more information, see the discussion on establishing the Limbo namespace. Fg2 10:27, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

P.S. It also applies to Limburger namespace. Fg2 09:50, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete It never ceases to amaze me what class of things people can come up with. (I apologize if someone can come up with a citation.) Steveo2 11:01, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Probably a hoax, and anyway, there's no verifability. Beno1000 13:13, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, unless sources can be added to article. I am somehow suspicious that this will lead to a "cutting the cheese tradition" article. Docether 14:41, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete Believe this and you'll believe anything. Someone competent enough to write this well is quite competent enough to provide references and links - well, if they existed, that is. Tyrenius 18:05, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Drop this article like a cheese. Ahem. Delete. Kuzaar 18:07, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, unverifiable, hoax. --Terence Ong 04:43, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete – as an unsourced probable hoax – Gurch 13:30, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.