Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drew McKissick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Rob Church ^{Talk | FAHD} 23:43, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Drew McKissick

Was listed for speedy as a nn-bio, but it does just barely assert notability, so I'm bringing it here. Even though I refrained from speedying it, I vote delete because I'm still not convinced he's notable enough. Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 21:44, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, agree not notable. Only thing that is close to notability is being a delegate to the 2004 Republican National Convention and that's not notable enough. And everyone has a blog nowadays, promo. feydey 22:06, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, while I continue to caution against a bias against blogs and bloggers, I agree that this is not a blog of note. While Mr. McKissick may be notable, more information is needed (if the author reads this before the 5-day period is over, consider a rewrite with any information you feel may better support the notability of this subject). This feels too much like promotion for the blog. While I do consider a delegate to a national party convention significant, I can't justify it as notable enough as there are simply so many delegates and they are often chosen for patronage reasons, not substantive ones, so that such a selection automatically conveys notability. el_amante 21:00, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.