Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 05:37, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dreen

Nonsense. Or non-notable personal essay. Either way, needs deleting. --maru (talk) Contribs 13:38, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:27, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nonsense, WP:NOR. Proto t c 15:33, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Flapdragon 16:03, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Nathan Beach 16:45, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. *drew 17:12, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. -Rebelguys2 19:08, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - not encyclopaedic. Latinus 20:22, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, possibly patent nonsense, try tagging it. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 00:33, Jan. 26, 2006
• It's not nonsense, although a previous version (now speedied) was. This one was only rescued from a similar fate when the article's author kindly stepped up to the plate and provided enough context for the reader to discern a hazy kind of understanding from the article. O' course, that doesn't mean it's encyclopaedic. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 15:38, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.