Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don and Drew Show

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Sceptre ^(Talk) 23:33, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Don and Drew Show

Extremely non-notable podcast. no Alexa ranking, 252, no kidding google hits, etc. nn vanity self advertisement podcastcruft. Timecop 03:33, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

• Testimonial by drag:I think these guys are really talented. They make a song like in how many days. how many people can do that anyway. Even though it sounds kinda crappy, at least its funnyy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by zzz (talk • contribs) 2006-01-11 09:49:52 UTC.
• Testimonial by Tan DX:Let me testify.This podcast is one of the most downloaded in the world.Honestly. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tdxiang (talk • contribs) 2006-01-07 04:29:42 UTC.

You wish. Honestly. --Timecop 04:56, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

• Testimonial by Femmina - kids kiDS KIIDS!!1one -- Femmina 18:00, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. Incognito 03:35, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I've taken dumps more notable than this article. Cptchipjew 03:35, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - vanispamcruftisement --Hosterweis 03:36, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - please. are they on $3 crack or what?. my ears are bleeding - Femmina 03:38, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nomination. - Tapir 03:41, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per reasons above, but it's down to 243 Google hits. OCNative 04:19, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom DrIdiot 04:25, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep --Terence Ong ^Talk 04:30, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Even if if were the most notable Podcast in the world, the promotional tone of this article is unacceptable. Daniel Case 05:15, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep. This nomination is inaccurate. The article is about a radio show on a nation-wide channel, not just a podcast. The reason given for nomination is therefore inaccurate and it has misled the other votes. Speedy keep and renominate with the correct infomation please. --Vsion 09:01, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. radio show not just a podcast and its apparently "Singapore's 1st podcast" [1]. -- Astrokey44|talk 10:31, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete because of non-notability - not the quality of tha article (which could always be cleaned up.) Ifnord 16:25, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dustimagic 19:03, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn. Eusebeus 19:12, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I really think these votes need to be re-evaluated. It seems as if the original nomination was confused and thought this was merely a non-notable podcast. Apparently it is a popular Singapore radio show. It's not surprising it doesn't get a lot of English Google hits; maybe try searching in the original language? Cyde Weys _vote^talk 06:43, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
  • The show is in ENGLISH. So if it was notable, it would generate enough hits in ENGLISH. As it stands now, it's just some random podcast trying to increase page rank. The only 2 keep votes are 1) the article creator and 2) his friend. (both 13 years olds from singapore). --Timecop 02:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Maybe they are Don and Drew. --Hosterweis 04:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per above. --Depakote 15:17, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Googling the website gets a whopping 24 hits, several of which are advertising about the show itself. WhiteNight ^{T | @ | C} 07:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom, also note it fails WP:WEB. Proto t c 10:40, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Obviously, non-notable. --Depakote 15:30, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Already commented a vote above WhiteNight ^{T | @ | C} 23:42, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete--Tokek 07:46, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.