Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominic wightman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 04:42, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dominic wightman

Tagged for speedy as nn-bio, but I think by fairly common practise, we take a media mention as at least an assertion. So AfD gets to make the decision instead. -Splash^talk 00:50, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

• The original article didn't even mention the media coverage -- i found that on google. But several copies of the same two sentance mention was all I could find, after i sorted out mentions of other people of the same name. Delete as non-notable. DES ^(talk) 00:55, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
  • • DESiegel - I changed your formatting to what I believe you intended. --CastAStone 01:14, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This is surprisingly verifiable. But, one minor mention for having a disease is not much of a claim to fame. Friday (talk) 02:54, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Surviving a mosquito bite is stretching notability a bit! Dlyons493 Talk 07:29, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable. utcursch | talk 11:18, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - nn vanity. CLW 18:54, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - but nice human interest story. Survive an attack by Mike Tyson as well and maybe I will change my mind. Qaz ^(talk) 04:47, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.