Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Does an eclipse influence human beings?

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:18, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Does an eclipse influence human beings?

Personal essay? I'd speedy-- -- ( drini's _vandalproof page ☎ ) 05:49, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. "Original research"/personal opinions. Doesn't quite meet speedy criteria. (What csd does it meet?) ERcheck 05:56, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I'd say merge to Eclipse but this info is already there... in a less personal-essay-ish form. --W.marsh 05:59, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, total nonsense.
• Delete per nom. Not the only article like this that the user has created, either. Indium 08:21, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, already covered elsewhere in suitable encyclopedic tone. Not a useful redirect. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:37, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
• Does a delete influence articles? Radiant_>|< 11:47, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
• Weak delete - bad title, interesting idea. There are lots of traditions concerning eclipses, as well as prophecies etc. --MacRusgail 14:00, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. Now that would be an interesting article and a keeper: Traditions, superstitions, and prophecies about lunar eclipses. ♠DanMS 16:00, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Per nomination. encephalon 15:31, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom SchrödingersRoot 20:46, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Blackcap | talk 22:14, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.