Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dj lottery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete. kingboyk 12:10, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dj lottery

Non-notable disc jockey. I would have speedied this but it does assert notability. CrypticBacon 10:14, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete. I don't see how this really asserts importance, nor is verifiable. See WP:BIO, WP:V. --Aude (talk | contribs) 10:16, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
  • The article says "he is the focus of a raging debate in the music world", which I'm sure is complete BS, but still an assertion of notability. I support the vote for speedy deletion, regardless. --CrypticBacon 11:21, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
    • "However, he is the focus of a raging debate in the music world, centering on two questions: has he had help in the form of illegal performance-improving drugs, and if so, to what degree, if any, does the use of these drugs account for his accomplishments?". I'm glad I'm not the only one who rejects A7 request if there's a slight assertion of notability, but I'm going to have to disagree on this one. The "raging debate" claim is nonsense and as such is not a valid assertion. The suggestion that a DJ has such acomplishments that he might be using, say, THG is pure fantasy. --kingboyk 12:09, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.