Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dissipated Eight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. – Sceptre ^(Talk) 11:36, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dissipated Eight

• Delete Is this group really famous enough to warrant a page on wikipedia? Flexon1985 07:44, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
• As far as I can see, none of their CDs are available on Amazon, but Google does get 573 hits and "Male Collegiate Album of the Year" satisfies WP:MUSIC as far as I'm concerned. And it's not a bad article, too! I say keep. GeorgeStepanek\^talk 08:33, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. One of those continuous collegiate music groups that has some borderline notability.
• Keep --Terence Ong 11:01, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep 15 years of discography is hard to come buy, i'm sure one of their fans will put more info. —This user has left wikipedia 12:53 2006-01-23
• Delete I've been a big fan of this group's work ever since the release of their 1990 LP Super 8!, their most accomplished album. Its commercial sounds with deep pop grooves were appealing in a narrower way than their great, great live concerts, but still deeply satisfying. I think their rendition of "I Do" was the most moving a capella song of the 1990s about monogamy and committment. As far as I'm concerned it was the greatest achievement in pop music to date. But lately their work has become too artsy, too intellectual. Students at Middlebury College, which I still attend, have lost interest in this group, which has lost touch with its base. The back-to-back departures of Kevin Manfredi and Erik Carleton in 2000 and 2001 really destroyed the group's moral. They want to fit in, but they can't. Their site should be deleted unless they can facilitate a return to the traditional moral values that they so strongly held on to for their first 40 years.—Slackerman 2006-01-25 12:06Z

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.