Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Die lois die

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel ^§ 23:42, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Die lois die

Delete Non-existant website that "will be up in December 2007". Despite not existing it is "a exreamly popular website" (sic). Non-notable, non-verifiable. Prod was removed by original editor without comment. Gwernol 20:43, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

• Die article die.... err, delete Crystal ball reasoning. I guess we can't speedy it because it is "exreamly" popular. KillerChihuahua^?!? 21:07, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• According to the Internet Archive Wayback Machine, the site existed in February 2004. Some quotes from the site:
  • (March 21, 2004): "Sorry, still no updates, I have been working on the new layout aswell as with a lot of media."
  • (January, 15, 2004): "I am really sorry for the lack of updates..."
  • (November 18,2003): "No updates in a while..."
  • (November 4,2003): "Yes, I am still here although not to many updates in the last month."
• With that track record, I'm not holding out too much hope that this site will ever be back up, or that it was all that popular in the first place. Delete. --Elkman - ^(talk) 21:24, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - the site in question is hosted on Geocities, and indeed consists of a single page stating that "The New Layout Is Coming Soon", last modified on the 14th of March (this year). No content. Fun. Zetawoof^(ζ) 21:53, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non updated website that might exist yet it's notable? Wouldn't this constitute a speedy--Tollwutig 14:10, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Comment I would have speedied it, but it doesn't meet any of the CSDs. The only one it might is A7, but that is explicitly for "article[s] about a real person, group of people, band, or club" so a website doesn't count. That's why I prod'ed it to start with. Sigh. Maybe we need a CSD for failing WP:CORP? Gwernol 18:40, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Speedy categories for failing WP:WEB and WP:CORP would be really handy sometimes. We've already got a speedy category for articles about bands and musicians that don't assert notability, so equivalents for web pages and corporations. Zetawoof^(ζ) 19:33, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.