Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dials

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. mikkalai and Russ Blau have collaborated to perform mergers and to create disambiguations. Good work! No-one now wants an administrator to delete anything. Uncle G 11:55:59, 2005-08-18 (UTC)

[edit] Dials

"Dials are device in the manga and anime series One Piece" – my vote is Merge into One Piece and Delete. --Russ Blau (talk) 17:18, August 16, 2005 (UTC) In light of the comments below, I withdraw this nomination. Russ Blau (talk) 11:56, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

• Please read WP:GVFD#Incompatible_votes, and avoid incompatible votes. Why not simply merge into One Piece and then redirect to dial as per our Wikipedia:Naming conventions (plurals)? You could have done that yourself directly, without coming to Wikipedia:Votes for deletion. Uncle G 17:39:44, 2005-08-16 (UTC)
• redirect to dial (after moving manga into manga). mikka (t) 19:02, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Note: I tried to close this case by actually making the redirect, but I was reverted. mikka (t) 21:44, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
• Move to Dial (One Piece) and Keep, then redirect Dials to Dial. Kappa 22:19, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
  • There is no need to rename the article. The text is already on One Piece. The redirect is enough. Uncle G 23:24:49, 2005-08-16 (UTC)
• Another redundant VfD nomination. In future just move relevant sections (if any) to main article then redirect the article 'to be deleted' to sensible destination. --zippedmartin 00:11, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Dial (One Piece) or One Piece and leave dab notice at Dial. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:07, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

I take it you mean a line on Dial (disambiguation) not a dab notice on Dial, this is hardly a big enough subject to require it's own dab on the common usage page. --zippedmartin 20:29, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.