Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devolution (disambiguity)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I've moved it to Devolution (disambiguation). Sandstein 18:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Devolution (disambiguity)

Devolution_(disambiguity) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

I started a page which I still consider to be necessary but which I cannot yet achieve. When I can, I shall return to the task but in the meantime please delete it. Abtract 09:55, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete - this is an author requested delete with no other editors having contributed to teh article. -- Whpq 14:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, "I'm not working on it" isn't a reason to delete. Someone else might, and disambiguation pages are good. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 15:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Wait, is the bot that finishes AFD debates called "DumbBot"? Wow, that's polite, calling someone dumb for having toruble with the AFD process. -- Chrissperanza! chat edits 15:54, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I think it means that it just just "dumb" tasks like categorizing deletion related tasks. --Wafulz 16:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
    • "Dumb" is a sorta-class of AI as well. It's not an insult to anyone (unless the bot is offended!). Move to Devolution (disambiguation) and AWB the links to Devolution (disambiguity). --humblefool® 01:47, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, rename, wikify. Give it proper wikifcation and move it to Devolution (disambiguation). Also include everything from the top of the Devolution article. --Wafulz 16:54, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Note - If the decision is to keep or keep and rename I will be happy to work on altering the links from other article (many!) but it is a long job. I didn't take offense at the dumb tag it is probably justified. Abtract 20:14, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.