Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DevPlan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:40, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] DevPlan
Corpobabble roll call: "powerful framework", "fully-conceptualized product", "seamless integration", "robust, event-based", "Intuitive user interfaces", "leverages intellectual assets" -- yep, all here. Nonnotable software and company -- also nominating TechExcel. NawlinWiki 20:03, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete both. Ewww. VoiceOfReason 20:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- TechExcel, Inc. would like to add an objective entry for our product, DevPlan, which we believe is an innovative approach to project planning and overall Application Lifecycle Management. We do not intend to sollicit business on this website; rather, we would like to present the functional purpose of our product and how it is unique with respect to other related products that are featured on the website. — Apot360 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Response -- Please read WP:CORP. If you can assert that either your company or your product meet those standards, please provide verifiable evidence of same (external reviews, etc.). Otherwise, Wikipedia is not a bulletin board for you to "present the functional purpose of our product." NawlinWiki 20:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for the advice and recommended readings; I have reviewed those articles and will continue to do so as I learn more about Wikipedia and its standards. In response to your request, I have included some legitimate articles and reviews on the product from very noteworthy publications in the software field. Apot360 20:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Further response Well, the article now includes a cite to a Dr. Dobb's review. Techies out there, is that enough? NawlinWiki 21:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I think not. I appreciate the article creator's efforts, but I don't think that he's proven notability of DevPlan per WP:SOFTWARE and certainly not for TechExcel per WP:CORP. I'm afraid my opinion remains delete both. VoiceOfReason 21:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Further response Well, the article now includes a cite to a Dr. Dobb's review. Techies out there, is that enough? NawlinWiki 21:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for the advice and recommended readings; I have reviewed those articles and will continue to do so as I learn more about Wikipedia and its standards. In response to your request, I have included some legitimate articles and reviews on the product from very noteworthy publications in the software field. Apot360 20:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Response -- Please read WP:CORP. If you can assert that either your company or your product meet those standards, please provide verifiable evidence of same (external reviews, etc.). Otherwise, Wikipedia is not a bulletin board for you to "present the functional purpose of our product." NawlinWiki 20:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per admission of [{WP:SPAM}} failure. WilyD 20:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete both. Non-notable, unverifiable. Rohirok 21:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Reads like an advert. Forbes.com gave me no result for TechExcel. They do not want to solicit business, they just want to pitch their product? Is that the currect interpretation of their response? I don't like SPAM. Unable to find where this meets WP:WEB . :) Dlohcierekim 02:28, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Spam -Ladybirdintheuk 10:25, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
