Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Detail

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete · Katefan0^(scribble) 05:48, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Detail

I wasn't logged in at the time, but it was me that proposed the deletion. The article is just a dictionary definition and I believe it should be deleted. --CoderGnome 20:43, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. No opinion. —Cryptic (talk) 11:48, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - I would say Transwiki, but there is already a better def in wiktionary.--Isotope23 18:23, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete dicdef. mikka (t) 18:52, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as dic def. I can't see this expanded in any way. - Mgm|^(talk) 22:37, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete It's a definition, and it's not even fit, at present, to be considered an adequate definition.Brian1979 02:25, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.