Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demon Wall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Bobet 09:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Demon Wall

Looks like a neologism. A brief search on Google didn't turn up anything relating to the definition given. Wmahan. 22:18, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

• Is a reference of common usage throughout New Zealand (Cultural meme maybe if you wana get technical). Have only seen a printed reference in Official New Zealand Playstation Magazine some years ago 98-99. I don't know about classifiying so seriously (neologism? your overeacting). Its relevance in terms of game bugs could be disputed but just because its not on Google your gonna nominate it for deletion? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Savre (talk • contribs).
• Transwiki to Wiktionary as dicdef. Yomangani 23:46, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep: heard of it, experienced it in games, doesn't need deletion.--Steven Fruitsmaak | Talk 16:38, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: to me, the issue isn't whether you've heard of it or experienced it, but whether we can document the term in a verifiable way. I haven't seen any reliable sources that verify the article. If the only printed reference is in a New Zealand game magazine several years ago, I doubt it's notable enough to be included. Wmahan. 20:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEO. --Peta 09:13, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 19:46, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Verifiability is not optional. -AED 20:48, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Transwikify or Delete Obviously a dictionary entry LinaMishima 21:30, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no sources. I can't say that I've heard it here in NZ, so I'm not sure how much it can be claimed to be "in common usage", but as it stands seems to be a dicdef anyway. Ziggurat 04:06, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I've also experienced this phenomenon, it's a good name for it. Unfortunately it's a neologism unless referenced. Ifnord 14:47, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.