Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democracy in america

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel ^§ 23:40, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Democracy in america

This is someone trying to promote his opinion. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. SCHZMO ✍ 21:59, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom as non-notable, non-verifiable, semi-vanity, and ranty. --Lockley 22:02, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Lockley. WP:NOT --Fbv65edel ^{(discuss | contribs)} 22:03, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - violates NOR (as volatile as that is right now) and NPOV. --RayaruB 22:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all other delete votes and redirect to Democracy in America (the Tocqueville book). --Metropolitan90 01:03, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all other delete votes. I'm curious as to why Schzmo didn't make this a speedy delete. Zelmerszoetrop 01:05, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
  • OR is not a speedy criteria. While I'm here, delete at any velocity as original research, and recreate as redirect to Democracy in America. -- Saberwyn 03:25, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- Deep Thoughts. Haikupoet 02:04, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Deleteno it's not original research at all...--Tollwutig 14:13, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• STRONG DELETE Did anybody happen to notice that this is an advert for a pyramid scheme type of thing???? Roodog2k 23:40, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.