Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DchozN
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:04, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] DchozN
NN per WP:BIO. Googling finds the first 10 entries all penned by the subject himself, either on his own site, or gaming sites of which he is a member; not verifying notability. Appears prolific, but not necessarily notable. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 01:08, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Your comments are exactly that. Your own narrow subjective opinion on a person the e-sports community has already deemed a forerunner, not to mention bringing digital editing of competitive gaming events to cable television in the near future - a huge step forward for the e-sports community. Because User:pd_THOR does not seem able to grasp the concept of e-sports nor what they are represent in terms of bringing a growing sport to a more mainstream crowd; as well as User:pd_THOR only bothering to look through the first 10 out of 100+ results not only shows his incompetence to thoroughly investigate a matter, but should bring about questioning regarding all said user's past article editing history.
- Hyungjin 21:13, 12 May 2006
- Delete but do not block for later recreation. I agree that Mr. Cho is certainly prolific, possibly even noted in his particular sphere of interest, I don't see that he is particularly notable as per Wikipedia policy. Most of his Google hits are articles by him, but none appear to be about him other than those which are autobiographical. Having many of his contributions in the past few hours, I see there being future possibility for him, and would like to suggest that the article be left open so that in the future, if he becomes notable enough for inclusion, it may be recreated.
- In addition, I think Hyungjin's comments are bordering on personal attack (See also: Straw man), and are inappropriate for this forum. Sorry, Hyungjin, but I think you were a bit over the line. ~Kylu (u|t) 03:20, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - per pd_THOR and Kylu. Zaxem 04:26, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above Funnybunny (talk/QRVS) 04:36, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per pd_THOR, until he becomes more notable. M1ss1ontomars2k4 04:45, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete while not very notable.--Jusjih 13:32, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. DarthVader 14:45, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete for now, per all the above. — Haeleth Talk 14:56, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 15:38, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.