Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Pollicutt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Robert ^{T | @ | C} 02:14, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] David Pollicutt

NN. I found no meaningful matches via Google. Delete. PJM 13:11, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

• NN? There's a claim to notability in there, and it's a good one (author of a book, he was featured heavily in news coverage, etc.). However, Google and amazon.com both swear he doesn't exist, which seems odd for someone with his profile. So delete as a hoax. PJM, please try to expend a bit more effort into your nominations. By saying "nn" when nominating someone who'd be clearly notable by anyone's standards (if he were verifiable) you just look foolish, and it's not good to have non-fools looking foolish. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 14:27, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your constructive advice and insight on using the NN term. I used NN only because of the result of my search, which basically made me disregard the claims of notability made in the article. PJM 14:41, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. If what the article says is true, he should be easily findable through Google, but I cannot find him through his name, nor those of his books, nor as a boyfriend of Kimberley Walsh. Apparently the article is simply incorrect. - Andre Engels 14:31, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as unbelievable and even if it was, non-notable. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] :: AfD? 15:10, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per Mark and Andre's reasoning.--PTSE 00:48, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax or at best unverifiable, per fuddlemark and Andre Engels. --Metropolitan90 05:25, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Hoax. *drew 01:38, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.