Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Fletcher
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 22:40, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] David Fletcher
Nothing but a page of vandalism. This page has been deleted before. BJAODN? --Hottentot
- Delete. That page is... amazing. Delete as unsourced, nonsensical... whatever it is. Fernando Rizo T/C 03:31, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. His ears unnerve me. TheMadBaron 04:14, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. In time (deo volente) I will create a page about the real David Fletcher.--MWAK 07:07, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Nonsense. – AxSkov (☏) 07:34, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete I looked at all the previous versions of the 'article' in the hope of bashing into some useful shape. I think anyone wanting to write an acceptable 'David Fletcher' might like a blank page to start from. Alf melmac 09:27, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete generally crappy article, suspect some combination of hoax, vanity, non-notability. PatGallacher 09:33, 2005 September 11 (UTC)
- Delete. Just a vanity page. mrholybrain 11:27, September 11, 2005 (UTC)
- Sheesh, right, Delete. What utter rubbish. — JIP | Talk 16:09, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Check out the history page. Someone has blanked the article to try to evade his VfD, and prior to that was apparently using the article as a chat room. Flagrant misuse of Wikipedia plus vandalism.---CH (talk) 02:46, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. All other criteria notwithstanding, posting the same picture of a guy that many times just dwarfs our current conception of "vanity page" on Wikipedia. --Jacqui M Schedler 02:48, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete The version as of now, September 16, is copied verbatim from [1]. So copyvio, too. --JoanneB 09:56, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.