Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Carr & Richard Taylor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 07:33, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] David Carr & Richard Taylor

Aside from the peculiar title, and the fact that only one of the two people seems to be mentioned, there's nothing in the article to indicate why this person is (these people are) notable — or very much else (thought there's a vague but PoV encomium). Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:16, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete — to keep things clear. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:16, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable. No encyclopedic value.Cpaliga 21:18, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
• Borderline Speedy for CSD:A7 as there is no real contention of notability in the article.--Isotope23 21:37, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete They're leaders of the Renewal Christian Centre in Solihull. While it may be marginally notable I don't see that they are. Article is unencyclopedaic anyway. Dlyons493 Talk 21:40, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete if it had been searchable, I'd say redirect, but it's not. --Doc (?) 22:14, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
• Comment Can we at least wait a few more days to see if any information about Mr. Carr goes up to find out if he is notable? I doubt that he is, but it seems we should at least find out. Articles often take more than one post to put up in full. --CastAStone 22:37, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

It's got 5 days - --Doc (?) 22:44, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Current article is an unverifiable hagiography, plus a (broken) link. -- Sliggy 23:17, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

(link now working) -- Sliggy 18:48, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Unless something magic happens here...--Daniel Lotspeich 08:43, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.