Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark lord of the sith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete copyvio and redirect to Dark Lord of the Sith. Canderson7 ^(talk) 19:56, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dark lord of the sith

Trash, nonsense article --Mecanismo 15:43, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

• It's a copyvio. Should be replaced with a redirect to Sith Dark Lord of the Sith once it's deleted. —Cryptic (talk) 16:41, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Darth Vader as that's the character more commonly associated with this phrase. 23skidoo 22:03, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete the copyvio. If you want a redirect, I think it's best put at Dark Lord of the Sith or Dark lord of the Sith. Current article has incorrect capitalization. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:29, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Well, I guess that settles it. Redirect to Dark Lord of the Sith after deletion. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:30, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect to Sith, Darth Vader is too narrow since he was not the only Sith Lord. Jtmichcock 02:10, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.