Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Thomas Pryor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete both articles. - Mailer Diablo 10:26, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Daniel Thomas Pryor, Rodan media
NN company (fails WP:CORP by a wide margin) and its founder who has an interesting story, but ultimately fails WP:BIO. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 00:38, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- NOTE: If this is deleted, there is a reference to this article in Rodan that needs to be removed too. --howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 16:52, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete: Company has "met with little commercial success," and its founder has arguably not had a significant effect on the wider world, although I'm sure he's beloved by his employees and family. Geogre 03:49, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk. 04:07, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete both. Rodan media appears not to have set the world on fire. Google does not come up with much re Pryor suggesting that verifiability is a real problem with his article see [1]. Capitalistroadster 04:11, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete both. I can give up voting delet on spammers any time I like, really I can. I don't have a spammer deletion dependency, honest. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 14:08, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete both per nom. Turnstep 17:59, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: The AFD tag had never been added to the Rodan media article. I have just done so. Please restart the 5-day clock from this point. Rossami (talk) 18:40, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete both per nom. *drew 12:38, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
