Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Paashaus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten 12:11, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Daniel Paashaus

I am sure Daniel Paashaus is an interesting and accomplished photographer, and one day may merit an article. However, at the moment there are no outstanding achievements cited, apart from artist in residence at Millersville University for 2005-2006. I don't think this alone is sufficient for inclusion. Tyrenius 18:13, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

As this is a WP:BLP comments should display a suitable sensitivity. Thank you. Tyrenius 18:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

This has been listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Visual arts. --Tyrenius 18:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Delete per nomination and WP:BIO. -- Visviva 16:12, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

• I will personally delete the article. I think it's unfortunate that certain people on Wikipedia feel the need to bully others' articles. I notice you have a few articles proposed for deletion, and I can't say I agree with any of your decisions. I have written a good deal for Wikipedia, and I don't think I will continue to do so. The "wiki" spirit of the whole thing is really overthrown when people create profiles displaying their contributions and, to make things worse, feel they can singlehandedly (and arbitrarily) decide whether something is worthy of inclusion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.136.17.123 (talk • contribs) .

User's 2nd contribution using this IP

• You can't delete it unless you are an admin. Please refrain from personal attacks (you can get blocked). Nobody is bullying anything. If you're talking to me, I only have one other article proposed for deletion. Well, it's commonly accepted practice here for user pages to display contributions. There is no single-handed and arbitrary deletion here: this is a debate which is open to all users, yourself included to have a mature evaluation. The article does not cite anything particularly significant about this person, so why should we include an article on them? If there are sigificant things which are verifiable, you are welcome to add them to the article, and to let us know that you have done so. Otherwise, you can say here what merits this person being in an encyclopedia. Tyrenius 07:01, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Checking Google there is little in the way of independent reviews to stand up notability. I have to say that I like his work but this entry has come too soon. He should come back when he can cite some awards or quality independent reviews. BlueValour 03:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Mad Jack 22:00, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom. Zaxem 05:43, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.