Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Lamey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:29, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Daniel Lamey

Not a real author. I'd send it to speedy under A7 but it asserts notability, even though it's not true. --howcheng [ talk • contribs • web ] 23:52, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk 00:00, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Only 131 Google results for "Daniel Lamey" and no results on front page result to the author cited see [1]. Severe notability and verifiability problems with this article. Capitalistroadster 00:57, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per above.--Gaff ^talk 00:58, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete this nonsense. --JJay 01:00, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• "Saskkatchewan, Nova England, Great Canada" wha? Unless I woke up in an alternate dimension this morning, that qualifies as patent nonsense. Speedy this crap. Bearcat 07:47, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.