Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Kaszor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:49, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Daniel Kaszor
While the student newspaper seems to be notable, I'm not sure if this year's editor is. DJ Clayworth 18:58, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: non-notable bio JDoorjam 19:51, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
- Merge
and Deleteto The Gateway He is notible wrt his newspaper, but not on his own... :'( Roodog2k 19:57, 25 August 2005 (UTC) - Delete speedy or otherwise, no merge required, is already on newspaper article. Alf 20:21, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
- Verify, then Keep if his paper is woth being here, the editor definitly is HoratioVitero 20:36, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
- Comment It's a student news paper, which means there's probably a new editor in chief every single year. JDoorjam 21:15, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
- Horatio, there is a middle-way between keep and delete. Not everything needs to have it's own entry. Multiple minor subjects can be discussed in one larger article. - Mgm|(talk) 21:26, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Note that every one of this user's edits, save for one minor edit to Bible, is to VfD. Zoe 21:35, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable. Sdedeo 21:01, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. --GraemeL (talk) 21:14, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete the article on the editor and merge the article about the newspaper into the article about the school. Zoe 21:21, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Any other magazine or newspaper with a per-issue circulation of 11,000 would be allowed an article. The stated policy is that circulation of 5,000+ makes a publication notable enough to be on here. We really can't hold student newspapers to a different standard than we hold non-student publications; if you disagree with the 5,000 figure, take it up as a policy discussion rather than simply imposing a standard other than 5,000 on one particular publication. Bearcat 17:11, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete the article is about me, it isn't needed. The merge on the Gateway page is unneeded though dkaszor 21:59, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as quickly as possible. Hall Monitor 23:55, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete editor, keep newspaper. Bearcat 17:11, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - what Bearcat said. Mindmatrix 22:18, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
- Uh, before anyone misinterprets my statement, I was trying to say as per Bearcat. I don't want Bearcat's comments to be stricken; really, I don't... Mindmatrix 22:22, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.