Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dadashri
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Ezeu 01:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dadashri
Delete non notable individual fails to meet WP:BIO. No claim to notability made in article or verifiable citations given. Strothra 19:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Keep I vote for keep, because
1) he is listed on Answers.com! [1] That in and of itself is PROOF that he deserves to be here. 2)he founded a new Hindu Sect Akram Vignan, article on the way, assuming this article doesn't get deleted. 3)he appointed a succesor. I don't think this organization is going to go away anytime soon 4)the organization has their own temple/compound in India [2]; 5)large number of TV broadcasts and round the world traveling and teaching by members of organization; [3] 6)he is big enough to be mentioned in Sarlo's Guru rating, nobodies don't get listed there- only those with somewhat of a following [4]; 7)This organization has a monthly magazine [5] 8)Whether it is true or not, he claims that he had the power to give anyone a taste of enlightenmentMoksha, and that he passed that power onto his succesor via a special ritual. 9)This was my first article I ever wrote all by myself (btw #1 is a joke, #9 is true and a joke). Sethie 19:49, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Please realize that this is not a vote but a discussion. --Strothra 19:53, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- Thanks, didn't know that Sethie 20:14, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Answers.com is worthless. They copy all the articles from Wikipedia. That article even says, right at the top, that it came from here. Fan1967 19:56, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, I did know that (hence my comment, #1 is a joke). Sethie 20:14, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Trying to have an article on every guru would be like an article on every priest or rabbi. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:18, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete nn. There are many gurus who found new schools or sects. He is one of them. Fan1967 21:36, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Zaxem 08:59, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - huge following; Indian equivalent of televangelist. 71.132.146.15 22:35, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.