Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyberguys
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:39, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cyberguys
fails WP:WEB and WP:CORP, 33k on Alexa - ten (or more) times lower than competition Rklawton 19:36, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep it's primarily a (printed) catalog business, so Alexa alone isn't going to present the whole story. They also sell on Amazon as well. I get 753,000 Google hits, and everything on the first two pages is relevant (I didn't dig further). Notable enough. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:47, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment once I eliminated the duplicates (ads), I got 69 Google hits - and most of those were ads. Lots of non-notable companies sell through Amazon, so that's nothing special. Rklawton 20:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Seems to be primarily an online computer part retailer - large spammy google counts is part of the job description. Bwithh 21:58, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment once I eliminated the duplicates (ads), I got 69 Google hits - and most of those were ads. Lots of non-notable companies sell through Amazon, so that's nothing special. Rklawton 20:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- CyberDelete as per nom Bwithh 21:58, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 17:08, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --HResearcher 12:02, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above nom --RMHED 14:46, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Nice company. Nice printed catalog. I buy stuff from them from time to time. They seem reliable. I like them. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:23, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. —Khoikhoi 00:44, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
