Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Custom Software

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep (and move). Mindspillage (spill yours?) 15:00, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Custom Software

Non-encyclopaedic rant. Doesn't belong here.

• Keep and improve. A bad start, obviously, but it is a big part of the software industry. Gazpacho 20:56, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - Needs expansion though, Custom Software is a distinct subclass of software in Stallmanism, it should be documented. (for example, see rms' explanation here. -- taviso 21:00, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, given Gazpacho's excellent rewrite. IIRC from the software engineering class that I usually slept through, custom software makes up a large majority of all produced software, though I also remember calling it something else – maybe I should have paid more attention! android↔talk 21:22, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, but move to Custom software. RickK 22:53, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, concur with Rick, move to Custom software. Megan1967 04:28, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and move as per RickK.Capitalistroadster 04:18, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.