Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curebie
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was No Consensus. Redwolf24 (talk) 20:42, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Curebie
Neoligism. All the extra discussion on the page is completely unneccesary as pro vs anti cure stuff is discussed much better and in a more NPOV tone on other autism-related pages. Delete or Redirect to autistic culture Ryan Norton T | @ | C 08:29, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete IMHO no need to redirect. Dlyons493 09:21, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - Neologism --Mysidia (talk) 12:32, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Curebie seems to be an established term in the autistic community. I disagree as to the NPOV of autism related pages. The norm is that questionable treatments are presented in central parts of the articles while anti-cure ideas are at best mentioned in "passing". For instances, the autism page has recently been updated to use "person with autism" instead of the anti-cure peoples choice of "autistic". --Rdos 19:40, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
- *sigh*. First off "NPOV of autism related pages" generally has community consensus here. In addition, the "person with" usage was only used for the third paragraph in the autism article because it wasn't explained yet in the article - for the rest of the article uses "autistic". Not only that but "Curebie seems to be an established term in the autistic community" does not mean it warrants an article on wikipedia... I mean what all can you say about the word anyway? The whole anti-cure pro-cure debate should be kept to pages that can explain them better and in a more NPOV light. Ryan Norton T | @ | C 20:09, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
- In that case curebie should be redirected to autistic culture and be clearly described in a pararaph. --Rdos 04:39, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- *sigh*. First off "NPOV of autism related pages" generally has community consensus here. In addition, the "person with" usage was only used for the third paragraph in the autism article because it wasn't explained yet in the article - for the rest of the article uses "autistic". Not only that but "Curebie seems to be an established term in the autistic community" does not mean it warrants an article on wikipedia... I mean what all can you say about the word anyway? The whole anti-cure pro-cure debate should be kept to pages that can explain them better and in a more NPOV light. Ryan Norton T | @ | C 20:09, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Neologism. / Peter Isotalo 05:04, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- Seems like a clear merge to autistic culture. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 11:24, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- Merge as above comment ··gracefool |☺ 18:35, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
