Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticisms Of Reiki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  13:06, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Criticisms Of Reiki

• Delete. Not even enough information to be considered a stub, plus: the user already wrote about the scientific criticism of Reiki at the Reiki entry itself, where it belongs. "Criticisms Of Reiki" is not really worth an extra encyclopedic entry, IMHO. N-true 15:15, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Reiki is another bit of quackery, but it is better to keep that on the same page. Midgley 16:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-article and POV fork. No obvious speedy cat, though Just zis Guy you know? 16:35, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per nom --Khoikhoi 08:36, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, empty. Pavel Vozenilek 22:02, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.