Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical Review

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Doc ^ask? 18:42, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Critical Review

Very well-written article, but speaking as a Brown alum who attended during the years covered in the article (and actually tried to return the questionaires), I'm still not convinced it's notable enough outside of Brown to deserve its own entry. I'm willing to be convinced otherwise, but until then, delete. SarekOfVulcan 21:14, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep; interesting idea; If it could be merged with something more general I'd be okay with that too. Tom Harrison ^(talk) 21:59, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per above. -- JJay 23:53, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Article is very well written and edited but nevertheless it is a student group project which reviews the university's courses based on student surveys. No extra-campus notability and therefore doesn't justify wikipedia entry --Mecanismo | Talk 12:44, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep on the grounds that other schools have looked to the organization for assistance in establishing similar course evaluation systems, and therefore there is notability outside of Brown. NBS525 17:01, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
  • I should also note that I'm the primary author, so I'm biased in favor of keeping it, but I wanted to clarify why I thought the entry should exist in the first place. NBS525 17:15, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Computerjoe 17:02, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep as per its associations with the notable Ian Maxtone-Graham (and Google [1]). CanadianCaesar 01:04, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as it possesses verifiable relevance beyond its home educational institution. Although not of equal significance to, say, the flagship student newspaper of the university, there are enough notable alumni, cross-institutional linkages, and generalized interest to merit a Wikipedia page, although for such a young publication its length seems a bit long. 07:35, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete irrelevant beyond the university. Stifle 01:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Not paper. Dave (talk) 01:32, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Deleteas per nom.--nixie 02:01, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.