Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CrimeBlog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 05:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] CrimeBlog

CrimeBlog (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This is a clear-cut case of WP:DICDEF. Incidentally, this is a combination of two of the worst words ever. And that 'duh' feeling about the definition. Delete, and if enough agree, Speedy delete by CSD:batshitinsane timecop 16:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

• TransWiki - to Wiktionary which doesn't have an article. It may seem obvious to many folks, but my granpappy doesn't know what a blog is, so the phrase might confuse him. Then again, my granpappy thinks computers are magic and need to be banished to hell, so I'm not sure it'll help much. I love that guy. Also, I'll remind the above user that when citing false CSD criteria, it is desirable to make the link point somewhere as specified in WP:HowToVentFrustrationDuringAFDReview. →Bobby← 16:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Comment Thanks. I changed the redlink. I still think deleting this is the appropriate action, seeing as after reading blog even in simple wikipedia, one could easily figure out that a crime blog is either a blog about crime or a criminal's blog. --timecop 16:23, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete - or Delete. Crappy, non-notable neologism. - Femmina 19:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Blog#Types_of_blogs or delete. Trivial dicdef. Sandstein 05:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Per nom, worthless blog neologism, etc. --Amanduhh 21:35, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Self promotion. Mikemill 01:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• TransWiki- this is more of a definition.~~
• Delete, borderline speedy (A3). --humblefool® 03:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Just delete it. Doesn't need to be on Wikipedia. Mattucd 04:41, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.