Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creation (1931 film

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 06:40, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Creation (1931 film

Typo in title, not worthy of redirect to Creation (1931 film). Please also check the Creation (1931 film), as I believe this qualifies for AFD as well MNewnham 19:02, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

• Rfd --Harrington is like Montana 19:23, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• Rfd per above, No AFD on the actual film article because, while a sub-stub at present, it can be expanded. 23skidoo 22:08, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as typo. I expanded Creation (1931 film) a little just now because I feel it should be kept. --Lockley 23:38, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect as reasonable typo. Creation (1931 film) should definitely be kept and expanded, it made the magic happen. CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 06:26, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect as typo, and I recommend a speedy keep as the nomination belongs on RFD. Stifle 16:40, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.