Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Seal

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Jinian 15:31, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Craig Seal

A teenager who claims to have various titles and an "Honourary [sic] Doctorate in Divinity". "Chief Executive of the Dexillon Corporation", "Dexillon" having the curious distinction of scoring no hits whatever at Google, other than this site, which is actually just a vanity URL for this one, and which is merely a set of links elsewhere. "Further information regarding His Lordship can be obtained by visiting" some other vanity URL, whose reality is this freebie. We go there and learn (among the cod-aristocratic mumbo-jumbo) that he's a student.

I hardly need add that Google doesn't show much for "Craig Seal", either.

This is vanity raised to a stunning new level, folks. -- Hoary 11:43, 2005 Apr 7 (UTC) PS, delete. PPS and delete the redirect page Lord Seal too.

• Delete, vanity. Xezbeth 12:34, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, delusional fantasy. User, having created a username of Dexillon, appears to be attempting to sabotage the VfD process. Average Earthman 13:17, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, almost remarkable level of pointless sophomoric delusional fantasy. Barno 15:09, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN, anyone? Radiant_* 21:26, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 02:28, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, Nothing wrong with the references, the order has been recognised as one of a definable nature as for its titles to appear in holders passports in the UK. We would also point out that although the church of seven planes may give ordinations freely, to our knowledge none of the related persons have any connections with the church except membership of the corresponding order. We would also point out that the church in question has been recognised and has legal status as a church in the united states, therefore, regardless of personal beliefs this is a legal church and a legal order. We therefore vote to keep. Dexillon 00:13, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • "We", Dexillon? How many of you are there, and why doesn't each have his or her own username? Incidentally, I note that all your "contributions" to WP have been related to the seeming nobodies Seal and Hudson, and the ludicrous "Order" of which they claim membership. -- Hoary 01:38, 2005 Apr 10 (UTC)
• Delete. Funny, but still nn, vanity. VladMV ٭ ^talk 15:21, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.