Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Mason

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 13:35, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Craig Mason

Delete overtaken by events, the result of this election was Richard Hastings R 108257 66.90% vs. Craig Mason D 53572 33.10% Ruby 22:27, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete yet another example of why these things should not be covered until well after they've happened. Wikinews is that way ----> Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 22:38, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --kingboyk 23:11, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and Update. Two-time major-party congressional candidate. -- Mwalcoff 00:13, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and Update per Mwalcoff. He got 33,000 votes. I've argued before that unsuccessful major party congressional nominees are often more notable than typical State Representatives, who are notable per WP:BIO. We have a featured article about Tom Brinkman and I don't theink he ever got 33,000 votes. TMS63112 18:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.