Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Couttsian Growth Model
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:24, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Couttsian Growth Model
VAIN, OR. — Dunc|☺ 12:12, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as original research. This is a one-man project. No references are cited (apart from his own home page), and I could not find any myself. I saw a link to the web site added to Rule of 70 and I decided to leave it in, because the article linked to has a clear though sometimes imprecise explanation of the Rule of 70, but I saw already then that the rest of his web site is his pet theory. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 14:24, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom Tom Harrison (talk) 14:53, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete all the original research from Mr. Coutts; I was going to give him a few days to find a real source before nominating this series myself. Note that beyond the 5 articles nominated today, he wrote Differential replication and Exponentialist, both of which are now redirects to Darwinism and Exponentialism, respectively. -- stillnotelf has a talk page 15:50, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
- delete as above Pete.Hurd 17:21, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per Jitse. Vanity also indicated by widespread linking in other articles. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 17:43, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
- 'Delete per nominator. --ScienceApologist 18:20, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per Jitse. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 23:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as OR. Paul August ☎ 03:59, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete NOR. Stifle 02:40, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
