Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cora Skinner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:25, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cora Skinner

This was tagged for speedy deletion on the grounds that it was a resume. Most short articles end up being a mere list of accomplishments, however, and it isn't like this is a text dump of a c.v., so I'm listing here for a notability consideration. Some of the magazines and calendars listed are notable media or commercial products, but no evidence that she herself has been singled out for recognition from those sources. No vote. Postdlf 00:57, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - Eagle^talk 00:55, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Make that delete. 325 Google hits for a model is abysmally low. Postdlf 01:00, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Correction, 98 unique hits for "cora skinner," and even some of those are unrelated. Postdlf 01:32, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn. Royboycrashfan 01:27, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep the total number of magazine appearances to me seems just enough to push her over the line to notability. JoshuaZ 01:30, 23 March 2006 (UTC) Changing to keep per 69.105.140.121. JoshuaZ 03:49, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 01:37, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable --Ajdz 03:28, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I'm the creator of the page (so I guess my vote doesn't count), and no offense taken if it's deleted. But if it makes a difference, this is not just a resume dump, and I have no affiliation with the subject at all other than being a fan who found her work on the Internet. Minimal Google hits at present (as an above commenter mentioned), but she's only been modeling for about a year and she's already made MAXIM Belgium and the Lingerie Bowl. In addition, I didn't list her upcoming features, but she will be in the Playboy Lingerie Catalogue as well as several 2007 calendars. I didn't list her TV stuff (yet), but she's also been on CSI, The Office, an Icehouse Beer commercial, ESPN2's Cold Pizza, MTV's TRL, and other stuff I'm not familiar with. I predict that the Google count will surpass 1,000 within 60 days (the MAXIM feature is just hitting stands now) and will rise from there. If it'd be better to wait and create a Wikipedia article after that happens . . . like I said, no offense taken. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.105.140.121 (talk • contribs).
  • It's note really a "vote" it just looks like it is, and while it's good form to declare your authorship, it in no way invalidates your contribution to the discussions. These are (mostly) divided into two sections: gathering of facts and chat about how those facts mesh with guidelines, policies, and tribal knowledge. Everyone is welcome (and encouraged!) to contribute facts, it's only in the opinons section that "time served" counts. - brenneman^{L} 04:42, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable. But, original author, if you're right, feel free to create this again in 60 days. (There are lots of TV extra/commercial actresses in the world. If this one actually becomes an overnight sensasion, sure, she deserves an article. Until then, sorry...) Ehurtley 08:25, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. And the author should copy the info on to their harddrive. If in 60 (or whatever) days, she is famous and notable, then recreate it. --Midnighttonight 09:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
  • It is so copied. Thanks.
• Delete per nom. KillerChihuahua^?!? 00:21, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.